"Fight cancer", "Beat cancer" are certainly popular expressions currently, which is good so. Although October, the Breast cancer Awareness Month is over, for a number of still see many individuals wearing pink ribbons on their own jackets, which is a demonstration of their will to help those women who experience this disease. Which can be very much appreciated and should be acknowledged. Fundraising and information events, web pages, donations, merchandise, ads all around the media, groups on social networking sites, individuals spreading the term - attention will be given to the subject and significant amount of cash is collected.
Conversely, looking a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the subject from the most various resources available for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and could be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.
Fight. A vital word when talking about cancer.
How do you best fight so that you win? You know your enemy.
An issue - any problem - may be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This certainly will be clear - how else do you solve a situation, should you not know what is it exactly?
Let's take cancer of the breast, it looks like this: on a yearly basis $ millions are spent to discover the causes of cancer And even more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments may be only effective once they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of cancer of the breast are not known." The truth is, Smlnj Gforge Cs Uchicago blog post as outlined by the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the medical field.
The theory of changed or damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change in the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that do not die and continue to multiply until a huge cancer cell or tumor develops."
Excellent. The next phase will be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, wouldn't it?
The environmental factors are virtually renowned for the scientists and for the public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then in the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the population on correct eating habits, cutting back the usage of harmful chemicals, and so on. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the rationale why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins and other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that can help one's body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the human body, the immune system and so forth.
But this isn't how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the common therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments accessible in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone find out how adding extra chemicals in to the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the human body to recover? Because it will not.
Conversely, looking a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the subject from the most various resources available for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and could be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.
Fight. A vital word when talking about cancer.
How do you best fight so that you win? You know your enemy.
An issue - any problem - may be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This certainly will be clear - how else do you solve a situation, should you not know what is it exactly?
Let's take cancer of the breast, it looks like this: on a yearly basis $ millions are spent to discover the causes of cancer And even more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments may be only effective once they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of cancer of the breast are not known." The truth is, Smlnj Gforge Cs Uchicago blog post as outlined by the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the medical field.
The theory of changed or damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change in the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that do not die and continue to multiply until a huge cancer cell or tumor develops."
Excellent. The next phase will be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, wouldn't it?
The environmental factors are virtually renowned for the scientists and for the public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then in the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the population on correct eating habits, cutting back the usage of harmful chemicals, and so on. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the rationale why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins and other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that can help one's body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the human body, the immune system and so forth.
But this isn't how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the common therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments accessible in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone find out how adding extra chemicals in to the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the human body to recover? Because it will not.